In his argument against cellphones in the classroom, Josh Allen asserts that "nothing that you can do on a cellphone will inspire students as they make their way into the world." I think that is a tad harsh, but I do agree that we can use other avenues of technology in lieu of cellphones. I have a hard time believing that socially excitable students could resist the temptation to use their phones during a 70-minute class, so I'd rather not give them the temptation.
Over the course of our MAT classes the past couple of months, several ideas for incorporating phones into the classroom have been broached. They sound good in theory, but I have to ask, can students exercise restraint in using the phones for personal agendas? And on a broader level, how much technology is too much technology? Where do we draw the line?

Bravo! Technology for technology sake is not necessarily good. I agree with the abuse problem. I can't imagine students having phones in their hands and not texting personal and/or inappropriate messages. I think the cost issue is also a big deterrent, but like you, I don't see much upside to make it worth trying.
ReplyDeleteThanks,
Everett